![]() |
Teachers Saving Children® Inc. - National | |
Newsletter
|
| |
January 22, 1973 - the day when abortion was made an individual right by the US Supreme Court. Today - 23 years later, abortion is protected by the courts, promoted as a fundamental right, and has become one of the most divisive issues within the NEA.
Recently I read an article in Family Voice (January 1996, Vol 18 #1, p 16) which discusses the meaningless words behind the abortion debate. After reading this article I began thinking about how the NEA has used the term "reproductive freedom" in their Resolution document. I began thinking about the annual debate that I've heard on the OEA RA floor regarding this issue and specifically the term, "reproductive freedom".
"Reproductive freedom" - what does it really mean?
According to NEA, reproductive freedom "refers to dual rights - the rights to abortion and to carry a pregnancy to term." (Deceptions by the Radical Right against the National Education Association, NEA Human and Civil Rights, 1994, page 9.)
As I read over the OEA RA transcripts of the abortion debate from the past four years, I found some very interesting statements made by delegates who are in favor of the current Resolution language. One delegate, a former member of the Resolutions Committee, stated, "When we use the word 'Reproductive Freedom'...we interpret that as representing a neutral position. Neither of our organizations (NEA/OEA) promotes abortion." Yet another delegate stated, "Reproductive freedom is a personal right of all men and women....It is a right to choose about your body, including abortion - be you for it or against it." And finally this statement was made by a delegate, "There is no more basic right than the right to procreation. And I'm sorry, but reproductive freedom in the narrowest definition is abortion...When we discuss reproductive freedom, let's look at the full definition of the term." (Emphasis mine)
According to Webster, to abort means "to terminate the pregnancy of before term (or prematurely)". To reproduce is "to produce (or generate) new individuals of the same kind". How can a term mean both to abort or to end the process of procreation and to reproduce or generate new, thus carry a pregnancy to term? It can't. Therefore, to include abortion as part of the full definition of "reproductive freedom" makes the term meaningless.
Let's continue to challenge our leadership and delegates to be accountable, responsible, and honest about the truth behind the meaningless term of "reproductive freedom". Let's continue to persevere in our efforts to remove this divisive issue from our Resolutions and other Association documents. Let's continue in the battle for the lives of the preborn - our future students.
Gary Winney has been a member of both the Ohio Chapter Board of Trustees and the National Board of Trustees since its inception. Presently Gary is the head of the Ohio Life Issues Caucus, through which delegates have been working to bring an end to the OEA's position on abortion. In the past, Gary has been relatively active in the Wickliffe Teachers Association. Most recently he has made the decision to drop out of the NEA. Currently Gary teaches biology to sophomores at Wickliffe High School and has worked with the high school administration in the discipline program. Gary is a member of the Association of American Educators, a professional education organization that provides much of the professional enrichment that educators have been looking for these past years. Gary lives in the same city where he teaches and is able to walk to school each day. His immediate family lives nearby while the rest of his family is generally scattered around the country.
TSC-National has begun contacting individuals within other states. On December 26, 1995, a letter was sent to all individuals who had indicated an interest in helping to start a TSC State Chapter within their state. Twenty-three individuals representing twelve different states were contacted.
Of those persons responding, strong leadership contacts have been made with individuals from Massachusetts and Michigan. Individuals from these two states who are interested in helping to start a TSC affiliate state chapter should contact the TSC National Office. In addition, if you know of pro-life teachers from Massachusetts or Michigan, please encourage them to make contact with TSC about membership.
Although the time for formal application may not occur until later, there is definite potential for an affiliate state chapter within other states. The process seems very slow, especially within an "instant-minded" culture. However, TSC believes in doing everything "above board" from the very beginning which not only helps the integrity of the organization, but also helps the organization to have greater impact.
Please continue to keep this process of beginning TSC Affiliate State Chapters as a matter of prayer. It is a great undertaking for all those involved.
REMINDER: All memberships from ALL states across the nation continue to be handled through the national office.
March for Life 1996: As a representative of Teachers Saving Children®, Miss Connie Bancroft, National Executive Director, was cordially invited to join other pro-life organization representatives on the platform at the 23rd annual March for Life rally which was held on January 22 in Washington DC. During the rally TSC was able to get national exposure as each representative clearly stated their name and the name of their organization. Special thanks to the March for Life Committee for allowing TSC to be represented amongst so many pro-life organizations.
Often we know who our local officers and building representatives are. However, most of our dues money, in fact - hundreds of dollars, goes beyond the local to other levels of the Association. Knowing who represents us and how they vote isn't just a matter of principle; it's a matter of how our dues money is being spent.
Comments are often heard that NEA and its state affiliates have a strong tradition of democratic governance. The NEA Representative Assembly, the main governing meeting of the Association, is the largest deliberative body in the world. All policies of the NEA are adopted by the delegates during the Representative Assembly. Delegates vote on issues that affect us in many ways. They adopt the budget and resolutions, enact legislative agendas, and consider new business items. They also elect Association officers and vote on amendments to the governing documents.
All delegates are selected by their colleagues in the local and state affiliates to represent their view in the deliberation of the assembly. It is not too late to get involved as election results from local affiliates are not due to their state affiliates until April 15. Unless your local Constitution & Bylaws allows for officers to serve as your delegates or allows for multi-year terms for delegates, most voting should take place between now and the first part of April.
So watch those local memos and newsletters carefully for NEA delegate election information. We will only get good representation when members take the time to get involved by educating ourselves about the candidates, and VOTING!
It is vital that each individual educator contact their local president in February to encourage them to have their local participate in this survey.
For more information or questions, please contact either Gary Winney at 216-944-4409 or Juanita Sattler at 419-826-7342.
Editor's Note: Reminder - TSC is NOT conducting this survey, but is only cooperating with Life Issues Caucus by reporting to our membership survey information. Please do not contact TSC regarding the survey.
Idealists go into teaching. That is, people who do not accept as a given that life must be lived as it comes, but who believe rather, that life as it comes can be made better. These people go into teaching because they believe that it is through education and the efforts of dedicated teachers that this phenomenon occurs. Though they live in and cope with the real world, idealists function with the knowledge that they can help change the world, one person at a time.
I am a teacher and have been "accused" of being an idealist. I believe that I have the power to make the world a better place by helping students realize that each one is unique and has something to contribute that make his/her life important.
At the same time that I am an idealist, I am enough of a realist to see wisdom in the old adage that says "You can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar". It is our human nature to respond positively to kindness and understanding, and to respond negatively to anger and confrontation. This is why I often choose not to argue my point of view on an important issue, but rather to give "food for thought" through example.
It is this combination of beliefs that has led me to become a member of Teachers Saving Children® as a personal response to the divisive issue of abortion and the official stand the NEA and OEA have taken in support of it. I am realistic in that I value and appreciate the strength that membership in the NEA, OEA, and my local association provides for us in the teaching profession. If this were not the case, I would not be serving as local president. However, I am also idealistic in that I insist that my opinion, especially when it goes counter to the official stand of my professional organizations and especially in regard to a moral issue, deserves to be heard, respected and seriously considered.
What the NEA and OEA have labeled "reproductive freedom" is in reality a pro-abortion policy. For those of us who believe every child has the right to be born, having our professional organizations and dues monies support the opposite view presents a moral crisis. Personally, I am moved to speak out my objection (therefore, this letter), and seek out the many others who also object but are hesitant to try to "beat city hall", or fear being derided for not taking the "politically correct" stance (consequently, my membership in Teachers Saving Children®).
It is this member's respectful request that our professional organizations become abortion-neutral; in other words, responsive and responsible to those of us who are not the most visible or vocal among our membership , yet have a right to be recognized and listened to. Or am I being too idealistic?
Editor's note: This is a reprint of an article from the TSC December, 1993 Newsletter. At the time this article was printed, Marilyn Bottger was President of the Berkshire Local Education Association in Northeastern Ohio.
|
|