![]() |
Teachers Saving Children® Inc. - National | |
Newsletter
|
| |
I am very excited about what is happening both within the Ohio Chapter of TSC and across the nation. There are reasons for encouragement as we reminisce over the past year.
We have seen healthy growth and interest in TSC. Our total membership across the nation, including Ohio, stands at 223. Many others have written and expressed an interest in TSC. Our presence and visibility across the nation, and especially throughout the state of Ohio, is increasing. There is also increased involvement of pro-life educators within the ranks of the local, district, and state affiliates of the NEA.
I recently came across two examples of the impact that pro-life delegates are making within the Association. At the recent OEA-RA, I picked up some information from the OEA Women's Caucus Display Table. Amongst that information was a copy of OEA Secretary-Treasurer Candidate William Dorsey's responses to the OEA Women's Caucus Candidate Screening Questionnaire. Mr. Dorsey has served on the OEA Executive Committee for 20 years and for the last 2 years has served as OEA Secretary-Treasurer. The following is his response to the question on "reproductive freedom".
Question: "How do you feel about the right to reproductive freedom? Should this be an OEA concern or issue? Why or Why Not?
Response: "I support the right of reproductive freedom. I believe that this is an appropriate area of concern for the OEA since women comprise more than seventy percent of the OEA membership. I do believe, however, that women are generally the most effective advocates for this position. I am concerned that opponents of reproductive freedom are gaining strength within the Association and that organized groups of women are doing little to make their voices heard." (Emphasis mine)
In the OEA Women's Caucus April 1995 newsletter, the OEA Women's Caucus Executive Committee expressed a "Resolution Alert! Reproductive Freedom". They took an entire page of their newsletter to alert their membership of the attempts "to remove the Reproductive Freedom language from our OEA Resolutions Report."
This newsletter will concentrate on the happenings and progress that was made at the recent OEA-RA. It is our hope that pro-life teachers across the nation will be encouraged and motivated to get involved within their own state so that similar impacts will be seen.
The need for an organization such as Teachers Saving Children® is vital. It is even more important today for the people at the grassroots level to get involved. As progress continues to be made, we need all of you who agree with our purpose to join in helping us spread the word about TSC and to encourage others to join with us in fighting for the lives of the unborn.
Remember, we can and we are making a difference! Please help by getting involved in whatever way possible.
Have a great summer.
There were two opportunities for pro-life delegates to debate the pro-abortion position of the OEA. The first opportunity came during the Friday morning session when the OEA Constitution & Bylaw Amendment Proposal 3 was discussed. The intent of this amendment was to prohibit the OEA from using money from the general fund and/or dues to support or lobby for either side of the abortion issue. (See TSC April 1995 newsletter for actual wording of proposed amendment.)
The delegates voted on Proposal 3 by secret ballot over the lunch recess. Results were given late during the afternoon session. Results are as follows:
| Ballots Cast: | 1251 | |||
| Needed to Pass: | 625 | |||
| For: | 558 | |||
| Against: | 665 |
Although the proposal failed, the margin of defeat was much closer than many delegates expected.
In the meantime, the Friday afternoon session began with the discussion of Resolutions. When OEA Resolution I-3 came before the delegates, there were several very boisterous "holds" and a mass movement to the phones for recognition to speak on the held item.
Here in Ohio Resolution I-3 paragraph 2 states:
The second amendment was to refer OEA Resolution I-3 paragraph 2 back to the OEA Resolutions Commission for reconsideration. This amendment was made by two "pro-choice" delegates who through their UniServ Council did a survey amongst their UniServ Locals. The survey gave some introductory remarks about the importance of finding out how members feel regarding certain critical issues, stated the preamble to the OEA Constitution, and quoted the first two paragraphs of Resolution I-3 with the question "do you believe this position is appropriate for our organization? They reported the results of this survey as follows:
Notice that the results are so close that the membership who had completed the survey were split on the issue. By sending the paragraph back to the Resolutions Commission for reconsideration, the paragraph would then be eliminated from the document until reconsidered by the delegates. This amendment also failed on a voice vote.
A third amendment never reached the floor for discussion because a delegate had called in to "close debate" on all discussion on the held item.
However, following a very lengthy discussion - probably around 2 to 21/2 hours between both the morning and afternoon sessions - on this controversial and emotional issue, delegates continued to discuss the issue amongst themselves. There is increased support to eliminate this divisive issue from the OEA Resolution document and more delegates - even "pro-choice" delegates - are not only speaking amongst themselves, but also beginning to speak during open debate to make this change happen.
As chairman of the Life Issues Caucus, I watched, with great interest, the events as they unfolded during the OEA Spring Representative Assembly. Once again, during a review of resolutions (--official position statements of OEA concerning various educational and noneducational issues), there was a discussion of OEA Resolution I-3, OEA's premiere springboard for "reproductive freedom". There was an attempt to amend this item to a point where OEA actually detaches itself from any position, whatsoever, on the issue of abortion. Many "pro-choice" delegates are beginning to support our cause, in the interest of unity for the entire organization.
Much discussion about an amendment to the OEA's Bylaws (Proposal 3) ensued. The vote was quite close when one considers that there were about 1300 delegates present.
Our strategy meetings are encouraging and are attended by delegates on both sides of the issue of abortion, who participate in the interest of ridding OEA of this divisive issue. We will meet during the summer to continue planning strategies for future encounters in Columbus (OH). We are encouraged and thankful for new developments and look forward to the time when we can finally put this issue to rest.
For more information about Ohio Life Issues Caucus, contact Gary Winney at 216-944-4409.
Your voice can be heard! Contact your delegate(s) to the NEA-RA. They are your representatives! Let them know your philosophy on the issues. Request that they vote in favor of the above amendment. If you don't know who will be representing you, contact your state affiliate NEA office.
Secondly, if you are a delegate to the NEA, please contact Edward Weber (216-449-5372) for current information regarding involvement in Educators for Life Caucus at the NEA-RA this summer.
TSC membership is open to all pro-life/pro-family educators and concerned citizens.
Please be advised that according to the TSC Constitution & Bylaws, the membership year is from September 1 - August 31. Annual dues are $25.00. A reduced rate of $10.00 is available for college students who are presently enrolled in a college or university undergraduate degree program and to retired educators who are currently receiving retirement benefits. Contributions and memberships are NOT tax deductible.
Any new memberships received after June 1st are good until August 31, 1996. Although memberships and contributions are accepted throughout the year, we encourage you to send in your membership by September 1. This will help the Board of Trustees to approve a budget and make important strategy decisions for the coming year.
|
|